You are Here:
Libertarian Town Hall

Author (Read 1795 times)

Libertarian Town Hall
« on: June 23, 2016, 09:12:10 PM »
 

Spencer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • 5
    Posts
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Did anyone catch the Libertarian Town Hall on CNN? In my opinion it was a disaster as Johnson went through his usual rehearsed lines and failed miserable at answering anything with honest thought out responses. As much as I dislike the man representing Libertarianism in the mainstream, I thought this might be a chance to spark curiosity in our direction. Any other thoughts?
 

Re: Libertarian Town Hall
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2016, 01:04:47 AM »
 

MattATatTat

  • Guest
People still watch CNN?
 

Re: Libertarian Town Hall
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2016, 04:10:55 AM »
 

FreedomIsOurDestiny

  • Newbie
  • *
  • 19
    Posts
  • Karma: +5/-0
  • Be happy. Be free.
    • View Profile
Unfortunately tens of millions still believe mass media is a good source for need. 

As such, I don't think any sound argument against the state would ever be allowed to broadcast through any of these outlets.

They've branded them all as biased stations to attempt to hide the fact that they are just propaganda.  It does seem like a lot of the journalists are getting bored with being told what to write and say, however, which is making easier to expose this as propaganda to the sheep.
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

― Mark Twain
 

Re: Libertarian Town Hall
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2016, 09:37:45 AM »
 

SurfManDan280

  • Newbie
  • *
  • 17
    Posts
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
I watched it through youtube re-run last night. Unfortunately Gary Johnson did not take much of a stance on any issues. Most of his answers were "well, we are open for debate on this".

He had two big opportunities on audience questions:
1- Abortion, someone asked about Texas making it difficult for women to get legal abortions. He could have said something like: when a state creates regulations that limits people's rights it is the fed's job to step in and remove those restrictions to people's freedoms.
What he did say came across as very indecisive on the Fed's role.

2- Drugs. A mother had a difficult story about her son's issue with heroin, resulting in brain trauma and being 100% dependent on the parents. He said, we only want to legalize marijuana, then went on to discuss needle exchange programs in other areas.
What he could have done was use it as an opportunity to explain the stance on ending the disastrous drug prohibition. Moving the issue from criminal justice to public health would be a huge improvement to the current situation.

Weld seemed more decisive on certain issues.

I think the overall message they tried to express was a positive one, where they were reluctant to bash the D or R candidates. Hopefully some people were able to open their minds to some ideas and it may spur some further research into the libertarian party and principles